I first heard this line over two decades ago, when a friend introduced me to Eddie Izzard‘s comedic genius with a VHS of his show “Dress to Kill“. In it, Izzard is funnier than ever, as he puts his own spin on human history. He introduces the topic of colonialism with this memorable sentence:
“We stole countries with the cunning use of flags.”
– Eddie Izzard in “Dress to Kill”
You should definitely watch the rest of this sketch here, as only Eddie can tell it as it should be told.
I started writing this text last week, and now that war has broken out on the European continent, it seems sadly apropos. Personally, I have never quite understood how flags can trigger such strong emotions. In the case of the United States of America, most Europeans would argue that school kids pledging allegiance to the flag every morning is overdoing it a bit. But flags everywhere do awaken feelings that, outside of a war context, my mind cannot comprehend. This is not to say that these sentiments are necessarily negative. We all know flags can embody collective pride and freedom from oppression. But they have too often been waved to celebrate the freedom to oppress. Or the freedom to claim land for a people, even on the moon.

Flags representing groups other than nation states, for instance those whose rights have been violated, do not seem to have the same effect. For example, although the Romani people‘s or the LGBTQ+ Community‘s flags may rouse ardour among the people they represent, they are mostly used by these groups to highlight the recognition of their struggles and the celebration of their existence. But in the case of nation states, flags are inextricably tied to land ownership and a shared past. And when they are waved, it is mostly to ignite pride for victories over another nation, hence at another people’s expense. The Collins Dictionary’s definition of flag-waving confirms this sentiment:
Flag-waving in American English
1. an effort to arouse intense patriotic or nationalist feelings by a deliberate appeal to the emotions
2. a conspicuous show of patriotism
That is precisely why I am uncomfortable with flags. This feeling may also be the result of my own background, with a German and Croatian heritage. Growing up abroad, I carried the inherited weight of the German flag which, although it is no longer the National Socialist flag, still bears the stigma of the unfathomable atrocities committed by Germans during Nazism. On the Croatian side, too, flags leave a bitter taste in my mouth. I have vivid memories of the context in which Serbian and Croatian flags were tied to tanks in the nineties, mere years after so many of the same people had cheered for the Yugoslav flag. (Oh, how quickly the masses trade one set of convictions for another!)
Whatever the reason for my discomfort, raised flags do generally serve to rekindle nationalisms and accentuate what divides us. And as another stand-up comedian, Doug Stanhope, pointed out:
“Nationalism does nothing but teach you how to hate people that you’ve never met and take pride in accomplishments you had no part in.”
– Doug Stanhope
Of course, not all who are attached to their flag are nationalists. Many see in it their bond with a community, which fulfils a fundamental need to belong. Sharing a common experience with a group of people can be very comforting, especially in times of relative isolation. But whilst patriotism places an emphasis on shared values and beliefs, nationalism rests on a shared cultural past, language, and heritage. This means that, by definition, nationalism excludes all who don’t share the same origins.
Its emphasis on heritage also goes hand in hand with any given group’s claim on the past achievements of their compatriots, whether living or long gone. And today’s successes of a handful of winners at competitions is celebrated by the entire community as their own.
What being a foreigner has also taught me over the years, is that people’s relationship with their country is like an extension of that to their family. Although most individuals will readily criticise their own state or countrymen/-women, any negative comment about their country by a foreigner, or alien, will be taken as a personal attack. One of the funnier examples of this was an experience I had while living in Birmingham. I once casually mentioned to my English flatmates that I didn’t like beans on toast, which set off a cacophony of xenophobic and nationalist statements. “Did I think my European grilled goat cheese in bacon sandwich was better than their English beans on toast?!” All of a sudden, our conversation wasn’t about food anymore, but about which nation was better than the other.
This universal discourse of what’s “ours” or “theirs” – with the implicit assumption that “ours” trumps “theirs” – was addressed in a documentary film entitled “Whose is this Song?” In it, director Adela Peeva goes on a search for the origins of a traditional tune sung in every Balkan country. Throughout her journey she found that, rather than bringing people together, the song was used as an excuse to divide communities.
Whereas I can’t understand strong emotional reactions to flags, I do have deep feelings and memories tied with music, food and dance. But even these three unifying elements, creating ties across all other cultural barriers, are being used by calculating leaders to add fuel to the flames of simmering nationalisms. My friends and I may not care whether the coffee we drink is Turkish or Greek, or whether we use Québécois expressions versus French ones, but there will always be someone there to point out dissimilarities and ask us to choose sides.
So where does that leave us lot, who just want to enjoy good company, food, music, and conversations, thus celebrating our ever-evolving group identities? While we try to build bridges between communities, great forces are working hard to shift popular focus back to flags and nationalisms. Away from the individual and his achievements, towards the group and its dangerous stupidity.
In the midst of disconcerting populist discourses on all continents, I think back on how puzzled we were by George W. Bush’s preemptive war in Iraq, back in the day. What a strange concept it seemed at the time, to attack another country because you suspect it might attack you. Offense being the best defence is a ridiculously dangerous notion. But if Bush Junior did it in 2003, using post-9/11 anti-Arab sentiment as ammunition, the same discourse will doubtless work elsewhere, in the aftermath of COVID and the 2008 financial crisis. For what better way is there to divert attention from the true causes of the wealth and power gap in our societies than flags?

In order to be prepared for all possible outcomes of today’s multiple crises, all we can do is remain adaptable, keep our eyes and ears open, move the needle where we can, and be ready to react fast. I also intend to use my universal foreignness as an opportunity to acquire as many citizenships as possible, so that flags and borders can’t lock me in.
Meanwhile, whenever I want to take a step back and laugh at our human folly, I watch Eddie Izzard’s show again, as a faithful member of his flagless community of enthusiasts, who know the meaning of:
“Cake or Death?”
– Eddie Izzard in “Dress to Kill”
Here is your pathway to join the community: Dress to Kill – watch the show.
(Title: Quote from Eddie Izzard’s “Dress to Kill”)































